[rules-users] Question on contains operator with integer

[Enda J Diggins]

That I don't know, sorry! Maybe have a look at the drools JIRA page, see if
the issue has been discussed?

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, cwolfinger <chase.wolfinger at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object
> of
> the comparison for containment that is an int primitive.  So my thoughts
> are
> if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules
> parser
> allow the creation of condition that is invalid?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
Enda J Diggins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100311/1564dbf0/attachment.html