[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

Toni Rikkola trikkola at redhat.com
Tue Mar 16 05:28:34 EDT 2010


Hi,

Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me 
what your model looks like?

Toni

Amit Kumar wrote:
> The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> They do seem rich in features .. especially support for 
> collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>  
> But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the 
> attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not 
> all of them.
> I am picking it from here
> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
> Any other place I can look :)
>  
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com 
> <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Jervis!!
>
>     On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
>     <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>         A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>         available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>         asset among
>         different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>         consider it
>         as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>         that you
>         think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
>         your
>         current package to the global area, so that this global asset
>         can be
>         reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>         maybe you
>         want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
>         appreciated.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Jervis
>
>
>         Amit Kumar wrote:
>         > Hello All,
>         >
>         > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
>         But for
>         > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
>         > roles/processing phases
>         >
>         > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>         can belong
>         > to multiple categories
>         >
>         > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>         > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
>         > categories witin them
>         >
>         > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>         > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather rule"
>         >
>         > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
>         define the
>         > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>         in Pant
>         > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>         >
>         > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
>         in Shirt
>         > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then
>         I will
>         > have to put it in both categories
>         > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>         on "XL
>         > Category"  and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
>         be an "and"
>         > relationship or will be an "OR"
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         > Amit
>         >
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > rules-users mailing list
>         > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>         > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>         >
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         rules-users mailing list
>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   




More information about the rules-users mailing list