[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages
Esteban Aliverti
esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 12:46:20 EDT 2010
But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com>
> Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to
> lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Its coming from a JAR
>> Thanks
>> Amit
>>
>> Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer
>> String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType String
>> OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>> hostname String productName String productFamily String
>> productId String
>> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>
>>
>> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
>>>> what your model looks like?
>>>>
>>>> Toni
>>>>
>>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>>>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>>>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>>>> >
>>>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>>>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
>>>> > all of them.
>>>> > I am picking it from here
>>>> >
>>>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>>>> > Any other place I can look :)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Amit
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>>>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
>>>> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
>>>> will be
>>>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>>>> > asset among
>>>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>>>> > consider it
>>>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>>>> > that you
>>>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
>>>> > your
>>>> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset
>>>> > can be
>>>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>>>> > maybe you
>>>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be
>>>> highly
>>>> > appreciated.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Jervis
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>> > > Hello All,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
>>>> > But for
>>>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
>>>> > > roles/processing phases
>>>> > >
>>>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>>>> > can belong
>>>> > > to multiple categories
>>>> > >
>>>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have
>>>> sub
>>>> > > categories witin them
>>>> > >
>>>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>>>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather rule"
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
>>>> > define the
>>>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>>>> > in Pant
>>>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
>>>> > in Shirt
>>>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then
>>>> > I will
>>>> > > have to put it in both categories
>>>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>>>> > on "XL
>>>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
>>>> > be an "and"
>>>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Amit
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>
>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100316/24b22377/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list