[rules-users] Drools Flow: WORK_ITEM_ID as a flow variable

[Mauricio Salatino]

I do not recommend that approach, I recommend to copy the same approach used
in the WSHT human task module. there is no need to clarify that Human Task
are only one of the possibilities for a wait state situation. But, WSHT
contains a good approach to achieve the same that you are looking for.. you
can copy that.. at the end the WSHT module is jut a Work Item with steroids.


On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:31 PM, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Long running process is not always a Human Task, that means the Task is not
> always needed. Let's say we are waiting for the response from the external
> system, and once response comes in, we would like to complete _this_ work
> item.
>
> Therefore we are looking to do this _without_ WS HT handler, and use
> Variable Persistence mechanism instead, so we can load the process, and do
> "processInstance.getVariable("workItemId")".
>
> What would be the best approach to do that?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-WORK-ITEM-ID-as-a-flow-variable-tp680939p687176.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100330/7dfd813d/attachment.html