[rules-users] Insert Fact Speed bottleneck

[Puneet duggal]

@ djb ,

Can u tell  me how did u inserted the facts urself ??
Is a  just a simple  assertion or  any  thing else ?



On 5/5/10, djb <dbrownell83 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Drools team,
>
> I wrote a Drools application for my company, which evaluates clinical claim
> processing rules.  That is, it checks current medical claims against the
> patient's historical claims.
>
> It appears that 95% of the run time is dedicated to inserting facts, which
> is presumably when it propagates through the RETE graph, since firing the
> rules takes no time.
>
> But it seems like it's not fast enough.  I made a rule template, which by
> trial and error of moving the conditions around, is optimised.  I'm
> averaging 310ms, and need it to be under 170ms for it to be viable.
>
> Is there any not-too-technical guide to optimisation somewhere?  (alpha and
> beta-nodes scare me a bit).
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Insert-Fact-Speed-bottleneck-tp778322p778322.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100505/4e11f639/attachment.html