[rules-users] Rule Flow: Diverge/Converge Issue with one-to-many paths being exected

[dcrissman]

Swindells, Thomas wrote:
> 
> Can you split it into two separate diverges?
> Diverge to B first and always follow the other path which then does the A
> & C,
> Similarly at the other end wait for A &C and then a second wait to add in
> the condition for B.
> 
> Thomas
> 

I am not sure I entirely follow your suggestion. A, B, & C could fire in any
combination, but always at least one.

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rule-Flow-Diverge-Converge-Issue-with-one-to-many-paths-being-exected-tp3493775p3493884.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.