[rules-users] 答复: Concurrent rule fire

Mauricio Salatino salaboy at gmail.com
Sun Jan 8 09:06:47 EST 2012


Sorry to not answer when you ask the question, but I'm getting hard
times trying to understand your requirements.
If you have a batch procedure that evaluates a set of rules that can
take 10 hours you can probably schedule the next procedure in a
different machine or try to solve the problem in that direction. Do
you want to execute both procedures using the same session? do you
require that? Can you please elaborate more in your architecture and
what are you doing with those transactions?
Cheers

2012/1/8 Zhuo Li <milanello1998 at gmail.com>:
> Any comments?
>
>
>
> 发件人: Zhuo Li [mailto:milanello1998 at gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2012年1月8日 0:35
> 收件人: 'Rules Users List'
> 主题: Concurrent rule fire
>
>
>
> Hi, folks,
>
>
>
> My project will handle about 1.5 M transactions per hour using Drools and
> the rules' fire are scheduled based on business operation cycle which might
> happen a few times a day. Say if I need to fire the same rule set twice at
> 10:00 PM and midnight. What will happen if the first execution has not
> completed till midnight? Will the 2nd execution be held up till the 1st is
> completed? I would assume there might still be transactions inserted into
> working memory between 10:00 PM and midnight although it is very few.
>
>
>
> My understanding is Drools will enforce only one active thread is working
> for the same "then" section for data consistency. Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Abe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -




More information about the rules-users mailing list