[rules-users] setting different value in consequence ( RHS part) based on a conditional check

[Esteban Aliverti]

Did I just heard Wolfgang complaining about being too dogmatic??? After all
maybe the Mayans were right :)
By the way, Vadlam,  did you try using a template rule in Guvnor?

Best Regards,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, FrankVhh <frank.vanhoenshoven at agserv.eu>wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Can I push you for a clarification on this statement?
>
> Imho, any of the following reasons is good enough to put a "decision" in
> rules
>    A- The decision logic is likely to be subject to change
>    B- The decision logic is too complex to implement in a procedural way
>    C- The decision logic is making sense to business users. (i.e.
> non-technical logic)
>
> In this case, option B is opviously way off. But one can only guess
> regarding A and C.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
> laune wrote
> >
> > Oh my, aren't we a wee bit too dogmatic? I've certainly been known as
> > being
> > a stickler to style and best practice and what not, but in this
> particular
> > case I'd use a single rule and offload the earth-shaking decision between
> > 'Y' and 'N' into a function:
> >
> > rule x
> > when
> >    samplefact1( $status: status, state == "CA" )
> > then
> >    fact0.setField1(  yn( $status)  );
> > end
> >
> > Cheers
> > -W
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at .jboss
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/setting-different-value-in-consequence-RHS-part-based-on-a-conditional-check-tp3690826p3692750.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120127/bf464640/attachment.html