[rules-users] Moving comment in DSLR file causes issue under 5.3

[Wolfgang Laun]

I'm not sure what exactly causes your errors - is it exactly what you
have posted, or anything different from what you have written, with
that line moved elsewhere or anywhere?

What does the resulting DRL look like?

A semicolon at the end of the statement is indicated unless it's commented out.

-W



On 24/07/2012, drdaveg <drdaveg at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is an odd one.  I was testing some DSL and have been tracing back an
> error in the translation.  The line marked in the code below, even as a
> comment, causes multiple "cannot be resolved" errors when moved.  Any
> thoughts on what could cause this other than a bug?
>
> Note that almsot all of the code is commented and as it appears now
> generates the errors.  If I move the line to the LHS the "cannot be
> resolved" errors go away.  The only interesting thing shown in the DRL
> viewer is that some of the comments appear duplicated.
>
> rule "Compute"
> when
> #	Fare(fareBasisCode  == fp1)
> #	 ts1 : TrainSegment(fl1 : fareList)
> #	 ts2 : TrainSegment(fl2 : fareList)
> #	 mySol : Solution()
>>	Fare(fp1 : fareBasisCode, thruFare == true)
>>	 x : FQ3()
> #	eval(fl1.get(fp1 )!=null)
> #	eval(fl2.get(fp1	)!=null)
> #	eval(mySol .nthSegment(ts1)==(mySol .nthSegment(ts2)+1))
> then
> #	> //int n = fq.nthSegment(fp1)   ****** moving this line can cause a
> syntax error
> #	> FQ3 test = new FQ3(); test = fq;
>>           System.out.println(fp1);
>>	x.setPassengerString("T");  // x.getPassengerString()+
> end
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Moving-comment-in-DSLR-file-causes-issue-under-5-3-tp4018882.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>