[rules-users] JBPM & ontology

[Olfa h]

Hi

I THINK this interpretations can use :

1) Using a BP ontology as a meta-model of BPs, so that BPMN processes would
be recognized as instances of the concepts defined in that ontology. You can
then "reason" over the precesses themselves.


2012/6/22 Davide Sottara <dsotty at gmail.com>

> Hi Olfa,
> sorry, I've been travelling in the last 3 weeks, I'll answer your emails
> shortly after.
> Now, for a general, public answer: "integrating business processes and
> ontologies" is a very broad question...
> Some possible interpretations include:
>
> 1) Using a BP ontology as a meta-model of BPs, so that BPMN processes would
> be recognized as instances of the concepts defined in that ontology. You
> can
> then "reason" over the precesses themselves.
> 2) Using a BP to orchestrate "Semantic Web Services"
> 3) Using the ontology as a data/domain model, shared between the tasks, to
> exchange information
> 4) Use a BP to express the transformations to be applied to a set of data
> defined in an ontology
> 5) Any combination of the above and more...
>
> you can google up a number of papers, reports, standards, works etc for any
> of them and possibly more
> JBPM people, feel free to pick up the lines ;)
> Best
> Davide
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-JBPM-ontology-tp4018187p4018194.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120626/b0088ee5/attachment.html