[rules-users] JPA vs Marshaller for session persistence

[Mark Proctor]

JPA is just a wrapper to the marshaller adding transactions and persistence.

Mark
On 23 Nov 2012, at 14:18, magnusv <magnus.vojbacke at digitalroute.com> wrote:

> Are there any disadvantages to using the Marshaller instead of JPA for
> persistence?
> 
> We are running Drools as an embedded service, and we would favor the
> Marshaller because we don't want to handle the persisting of the session id
> between system reboots. We're currently not using JPA in our system, and it
> seems unnecessary to add it just for Drools.
> 
> In which scenarios would it be appropriate to use JPA and Marshalling
> respectively?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persistence-tp4020955.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users