[rules-users] Inconsistent behavior of a rule

[dec]

laune, thanks for the quick response.


laune wrote
>>                 $supportFT: supportFT(value == null || value !=null)
>>                 condFT(value == $supportFT.getValue())
>>                 $conclusion: testInferred()
>>
> 
> This could be due to a misuse, e.g., a change of a fact without
> update/modify.

see the drl- it is only changed by using 'modify'.


laune wrote
>>                 $supportFT: supportFT()
>>                 supportFT(value == $condFt.getValue())
>>                 $conclusion: testInferred()
>>
> 
> This is either incomplete or illegal: undeclared $condFt.

See the updated line. This is what i had meant
                 $condFt: condFt()
                 supportFT(value == $condFt.getValue())
                 $conclusion: testInferred()




--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Inconsistent-behavior-of-a-rule-tp4021003p4021006.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.