[rules-users] Can we use rule "extends" option in decision tables?

[lhorton]

Today's drools blog post (
http://blog.athico.com/2012/09/conditional-named-consequences-in.html )
pointed out a rule option I hadn't noticed: the "extends" option to let one
rule extend another one.  There is little info in the Expert docs about
this, but I tried it out with drl rules and it seems to work beautifully.  I
can see big potential for simplifying some of our currently quite repetitive
rules.  My question:  can this option be used in a decision table and if so,
how?  I don't see any reference to it in the decision table documentation.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-use-rule-extends-option-in-decision-tables-tp4019653.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.