[rules-users] problem when upgrading to 5.4.0.Final, got UnsupportedOperationException on an update call
Michal Bali
michalbali at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 07:24:27 EDT 2012
FYI I have created JBRULES-3632 and attached minimalistic maven project
that reproduces this issue.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Michal Bali <michalbali at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am upgrading an application from 5.3.0.Final to 5.4.0.Final and I am
> getting the following exception:
> Exception executing consequence for rule "ruleThatFails" in
> indexingproblem.remove.me.anditworks:
> java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
> at
> org.drools.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:1287)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireNextItem(DefaultAgenda.java:1212)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1446)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:710)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:674)
> at
> org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:230)
> at com.mycompany.app.IndexingProblemMain.main(IndexingProblemMain.java:36)
> Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
> at org.drools.reteoo.BaseLeftTuple.getPrevious(BaseLeftTuple.java:480)
> at org.drools.core.util.index.LeftTupleList.remove(LeftTupleList.java:114)
> at
> org.drools.core.util.index.LeftTupleList.removeAdd(LeftTupleList.java:68)
> at org.drools.reteoo.JoinNode.modifyLeftTuple(JoinNode.java:310)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.LeftTupleSource.doModifyLeftTuple(LeftTupleSource.java:304)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.LeftTupleSource.modifyLeftTuple(LeftTupleSource.java:278)
> at org.drools.reteoo.JoinNode.modifyLeftTuple(JoinNode.java:437)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleLeftTupleSinkAdapter.doPropagateModifyLeftTuple(SingleLeftTupleSinkAdapter.java:205)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleLeftTupleSinkAdapter.propagateModifyObject(SingleLeftTupleSinkAdapter.java:235)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.LeftInputAdapterNode.modifyObject(LeftInputAdapterNode.java:170)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateModifyObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:68)
> at org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.modifyObject(AlphaNode.java:157)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:507)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:421)
> at org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.modifyObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:314)
> at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.modifyObject(EntryPointNode.java:265)
> at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.update(NamedEntryPoint.java:483)
> at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.update(NamedEntryPoint.java:383)
> at
> org.drools.base.DefaultKnowledgeHelper.update(DefaultKnowledgeHelper.java:337)
> at
> indexingproblem.remove.me.anditworks.Rule_ruleThatFails_b159773c7b1a41a2a93044d2816b96ca.defaultConsequence(Rule_ruleThatFails_b159773c7b1a41a2a93044d2816b96ca.java:9)
> at
> indexingproblem.remove.me.anditworks.Rule_ruleThatFails_b159773c7b1a41a2a93044d2816b96caDefaultConsequenceInvokerGenerated.evaluate(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> indexingproblem.remove.me.anditworks.Rule_ruleThatFails_b159773c7b1a41a2a93044d2816b96caDefaultConsequenceInvoker.evaluate(Unknown
> Source)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:1277)
> ... 6 more
>
>
> I have tried to create a minimal test case that recreates this issue, here
> it is:
> package indexingproblem.remove.me.anditworks;
>
> declare Criteria
> processed : boolean
> end
>
> declare CheeseCriteria extends Criteria
> end
>
> rule setUp
> salience 10000
> when
> then
> insert(new CheeseCriteria());
> end
>
> rule aaa
> when
> CheeseCriteria( )
> then
> end
>
> rule bbb
> when
> CheeseCriteria( )
> then
> end
>
> rule ccc
> when
> CheeseCriteria( )
> then
> end
>
>
> rule eeeFalse
> when
> Criteria( processed == false )
> then
> end
>
> declare Filter
>
> end
>
> rule fffTrue
> when
> Criteria( processed == true )
> Filter( )
> then
>
> end
>
> rule ruleThatFails
> when
> $criteria : Criteria( processed == false )
> then
> modify($criteria) {
> setProcessed(true)
> }
> end
>
> I've tried to run it on 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT, but I got the same result. Note
> that if you change the rule package to be "package indexingproblem" the
> exception is not thrown. The code for building the KnowledgeBase is
> standard, I haven't used any additional options. No fact is inserted only
> one fireAllRules call.
>
> Please let me know if I should create a new JIRA ticket for this or if I
> am doing something wrong.
>
> Thanking you in advance.
> Best regards,
> Michal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120920/fe9306f7/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list