[rules-users] Issue with Rule X1 extends X2

[Davide Sottara]

Unfortunately this feature is not supported, so the rules have to be
declared in the same package.
This is potentially part of a larger discussion: we don't have a
consistent way to ID-entify a rule.
I'll raise the question on the developer channels.
Davide

On 03/29/2013 10:26 AM, arul.prashanth at gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks David.
>
> The Rule extends works if the two drl packages are the same. Can you shed
> some light on "fully qualified name rule name" ?
>
> I have a package org.poc.test with Rule Rule_1X and org.poc.test.tx with
> Rule Rule_11
>
> package org.poc.test
>
> rule "Rule Rule_1X"
> when // do something
> then //do something
> end
>
> package org.poc.test.tx
>
> rule "Rule Rule_11" extends "org.poc.test.Rule_1X"
> when // do something
> then //do something
> end
>
> Doesn't seem to extend the base rule. Am I using teh fully qualified rule
> name?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-Rule-X1-extends-X2-tp4023114p4023120.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>