[rules-users] java dialect and declared types

[Mark Proctor]

The building and loading of rules will take longer.

Also there will be no performance games for rule bases that do not have joins. there may be a minor overhead for those, but it should be < 10% difference.

Mark


On 23 Jan 2014, at 16:05, pmander <paul.s.mander at gmail.com> wrote:

> I should qualify this with the way that we are using drools. In general
> perhaps 6 is quicker that 5.5. It will be extremely difficult to create a
> self contained test to demonstrate this as the tests are performed with tens
> of millions of transactions against ten of thousands of rules.
> 
> I will however attempt to scale this down to something that can demonstrate
> these findings. This wont happen straight away so pin this thread and
> hopefully in a week or so I will be able to submit something.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp4027822p4027834.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users