[rules-users] function in guided decision table

Michael Anstis michael.anstis at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 08:58:36 EDT 2014


OK.

If validation failed, this is a known issue - we just validate the single
decision table without including "external" resources (such as the
function, if a different DRL file).

If you save the decision table it should be OK - i.e. no errors shown in
the "Problems Panel" (this is because this uses a different mechanism to
the "validation" function).

The issue is recorded here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075039 and a related one here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071205


On 17 March 2014 12:01, Ioannis Christodoulou <io.christod at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I cannot find any possible way to declare a function.
>
> So, I declared it inside a dlr file (the validation succeeded) and tried
> to call it from the 'action' column of the guided decision table.
> The validation on the guided decision table failed, saying that it could
> not analyze the function call expression.
>
> Ευχαριστώ πολύ,
>    Ιωάννης Χριστοδούλου
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> "The problem is that I cannot find a way to declare the function and
>> make it visible from the guided"
>>
>> What does this mean exactly? Are you getting a validation error when
>> clicking the "validate" button? Did you expect to see a function listed
>> somewhere?
>>
>>
>> On 17 March 2014 10:25, Ioannis Christodoulou <io.christod at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone.
>>> I'm using the latest kie workbench and I have created a guided decision
>>> table.
>>> I want to create a function and call it from an action of the guided
>>> decision table.
>>>
>>> The problem is that I cannot find a way to declare the function and make
>>> it visible from the guided
>>> decision table. I have tried declaring it in a drl file, as well as in a
>>> dsl definition without success (the error is that drools cannot analyze the
>>> function call expression).
>>>
>>> Has anyone solved this issue before?
>>>
>>> Kind regards.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140317/864b653d/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list