[seam-dev] Xml module and preventing bean installation

[Dan Allen]

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Stuart Douglas <
stuart at baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:

> I don't particularly like the idea of @Veto being an @Alternative
> stereotype, I think it should veto the bean. Also there is not really that
> much difference between typing @Veto and @Alternative anyway, and
> @Alternative is clearer as it is part of the spec.
>
> Also implementing @Veto as a stereotype would prevent the bean being
> specialized in seam-xml, as seam-xml would apply the @Veto stereotype to the
> configured bean.
>

Good points. I'm not sure why I thought making it an @Alternative was the
right approach. Now that I think about it more, it doesn't make much sense.
I am still interested in having a declarative veto mechanism built-in
somewhere.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100411/b6390984/attachment.html