[teiid-users] removing system physical

Ramesh Reddy rareddy at redhat.com
Fri Oct 9 10:24:11 EDT 2009


Designer also uses the System.vdb, are there implications there? I am
not sure what is Designer's usage pattern. Seem though, Designer does
not need to depend on it. Somebody please explain, how it is being used
in the Designer?

On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 17:27 -0400, Steven Hawkins wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I would like to float the idea of removing SystemPhysical from the 6.3 release and converting System to a physical model.  System as a virtual model needlessly introduces lookup tables and joins between the SystemPhysical tables.  Also SystemPhysical is filled with a lot of modeling and indexing concepts that would be best not to expose.  Since SystemPhysical is marked as non-visible, not documented for use (from within transformations), and has all of its relevant information exposed through System anyway the impact and potential workarounds for this removal are minimal.  Let me know if there are any concerns.
> 
> Steve 
> _______________________________________________
> teiid-users mailing list
> teiid-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-users



More information about the teiid-users mailing list