[undertow-dev] Help, please: Observing low Undertow throughput underheavy loads

Tomaž Cerar tomaz.cerar at gmail.com
Sat Jan 17 05:05:36 EST 2015


1 io thread / core is on a low side.
I would start with at least 2 theads / core.

Keep in mind also HT with that cpus

Sent from my Phone

-----Original Message-----
From: "Matt Clarkson" <mclarkson at eyeota.com>
Sent: ‎17.‎1.‎2015 5:43
To: "undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org" <undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Subject: [undertow-dev] Help, please: Observing low Undertow throughput underheavy loads

Hi Undertow Team,


We recently deployed a large platform for processing high-frequency http signals from around the Internet.  We are using undertow as our embedded http server and are experiencing some serious throughput issues.  Hoping you can help us to remedy them.  Here are our findings so far.


-When we dump thread stacks using jstack for a loaded server, we observe that the I/O threads (1/core) are all blockng at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method).
-At the same time we see large numbers of  TCP Timeouts, TCP Listen Drops, and TCP Overflows, which would seem to imply that we are not processing connections fast enough
-There are large numbers of sockets int TIME_WAIT status
-TaskWorker threads are underutilized and most are in WAITING state sitting at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)


We've observed this situation even against a no-op end point which basically dispatches a handler, so we've eliminated almost all of our code from the equation.  We also removed HTTPS traffic to take SSL out of the equation.  CPU utilization on the boxes is very low and memory is fine as well.  Disk I/O is also not an issue... we don't write to disk when hitting the no-op endpoint


We're currently runnning on c2-xlarge EC2 instances (8 gb ram/4 cores) in 7 amazon regions.  We've tried tuning keepalive, IO thread count (currently set to 4) and core/max task worker count (40) to no avail.   We decided to move our compute instances  behind haproxy, which has improved the tcp failure rates but we are still seeing very low throughput (roughly 200-300 request/sec max)


We are using 1.1.0-Final version of undertow.  We tried 1.2.0-Beta 6 but after deploying our servers froze after about 10 minutes so we had to roll back.


Do you have any tips on other things we can look at ?


Thanks in advance,


Matt C. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20150117/e44e8da9/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the undertow-dev mailing list