[undertow-dev] Testing custom HttpHandlers

[Bill O'Neil]

Whatever you think is best. I'm fine following Steve's approach. Undertow
starts up and shuts down pretty quick.

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:

> We do publish tests-jars, so you can actually use DefaultServer,
> however I agree that this is not really ideal.
>
> I think the ideal solution would be to take the core functionality
> from DefaultServer and create a new repo (undertow-test-runner) and
> create some kind of UndertowRunner class that is based on
> DefaultServer. Does this sound reasonable?
>
>
> Stuart
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Bill O'Neil <bill at dartalley.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > How would you recommend testing custom HttpHanders? The DefaultServer
> class
> > in core part of the test code so it is not included in the jar for reuse.
> > Would it be reasonable to pull testing utils into their own project so it
> > can be reused? Or would you recommend just mocking a HttpServerExchange
> and
> > passing that to the HttpHandler?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > undertow-dev mailing list
> > undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20170116/c00b704d/attachment-0001.html