[weld-dev] Stateless scope in Weld?

[Dan Allen]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:24, Clint Popetz <cpopetz at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Adam Warski <adam at warski.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you considered adding a stateless scope to Weld?
>>
>
> I've definitely felt the paint of not having this, for all the reasons
> stated.
>

I agree with both of you and have attempted to defend this position in the
past. I thought using a dependent-scoped bean with Instance<T>#get() would
be sufficient, but I didn't think about the passivation requirement. We need
a truly stateless scope in CDI. I define it as a non-storing context. The
reference is resolved each time the proxy dereferenced (method call).

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20110114/346f9634/attachment.html