[weld-dev] Stateless scope in Weld?

[Pete Muir]

Note that the solution Solder provides for this problem is unwrapping producer methods, which are slightly more flexible than a stateless scope.

On 14 Jan 2011, at 22:25, Dan Allen wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:24, Clint Popetz <cpopetz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Adam Warski <adam at warski.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> have you considered adding a stateless scope to Weld?
> 
> I've definitely felt the paint of not having this, for all the reasons stated.   
> 
> I agree with both of you and have attempted to defend this position in the past. I thought using a dependent-scoped bean with Instance<T>#get() would be sufficient, but I didn't think about the passivation requirement. We need a truly stateless scope in CDI. I define it as a non-storing context. The reference is resolved each time the proxy dereferenced (method call).
> 
> -Dan
> 
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
> 
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev