[weld-dev] CDI EJB Intergration on Weld
Jozef Hartinger
jharting at redhat.com
Thu May 21 08:25:27 EDT 2015
On 05/13/2015 12:35 AM, Emily Jiang wrote:
> A further question on EJB injection,
>
> In the Weld reference doc, performing injection on JavaEE component class:
> To help the integrator, Weld provides
> WeldManager.fireProcessInjectionTarget() which returns the
> InjectionTarget to use.
>
> The statement was not mentioned when it talks about performing
> injection on EJBs. My question is that do we need to call the above
> method to fire the event.
No, you only need to call this for non-contextual components. For
session beans this is done by Weld automatically.
>
> Another observation with the code snippet on EJB section. It did not
> mention how the instance was created. I think 'it.produce()' needs to
> be there before the it.inject().
>
> // Obtain the EjbDescriptor for the EJB
> // You may choose to use this utility method to get the descriptor
> EjbDescriptor<?> ejbDescriptor = beanManager.getEjbDescriptor(ejbName);
> // Get an the Bean object
> Bean<?> bean = beanManager.getBean(ejbDescriptor);
> // Create the injection target
> InjectionTarget it =
> deploymentBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(ejbDescriptor);
> // Per instance required, create the creational context
> CreationalContext<?> cc =
> deploymentBeanManager.createCreationalContext(bean);
>
> *.... missing the line... Object instance = it.produce()*
> // Perform injection and call initializers
> it.inject(instance, cc);
Yes, looks like the line is missing.
>
> Thanks
> Emily
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Emily Jiang <emijiang6 at googlemail.com
> <mailto:emijiang6 at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you Jozef for your helpful response! I have another
> clarification on the interceptors on JavaEE component classes.
>
> EE7 spec states the JavaEE component classes, listed in Table
> EE.5-1, need to support interceptors. Take servlet for an example,
> which methods can be intercepted?
>
> As the servlet classes are invoked by the container, according to
> CDI1.2 spec, it seems only service(ServletRequest,
> ServletResponse) can be intercepted. No other methods can be
> intercepted.
>
> Normally customer applications override doPost or doGet, but they
> cannot be intercepted. I cannot see any value of support
> interceptors on Servlet. Anything I missed?
> Thanks
> Emily
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Jozef Hartinger
> <jharting at redhat.com <mailto:jharting at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Emily, comments inline.
>
> On 05/06/2015 05:38 PM, Emily Jiang wrote:
>> I have a few questions on ejb integration on Weld.
>>
>> 1)Does Weld handle the instance creation for ejb (using
>> injectionTarget.produce) or delegate the instance creation to
>> EJB container? I guess Weld will create the instead as it can
>> manage decorators. If not, how can decorators be managed?
>> Please confirm.
> Correct. Weld creates EJB instances using
> InjectionTarget.produce()
>>
>> 2) When Weld creates the EJB instance, how can the other
>> non-CDI aroundconstruct interceptors (such as the
>> interceptors defined via ejb-jar.xml or @Interceptors) be
>> passed in? I found out the WeldCreationContext and
>> AroundConstructCallback but I cannot find anything mentioned
>> in the weld reference doc. Is this the right plugin point?
> Correct, AroundConstructCallback is the API you need to use.
> The JavaDoc should be helpful. Let me know if anything is not
> clear. I'll add a note about it to the refdoc.
>>
>> 3)If Weld creates the EJB instance, how can all interceptors
>> (cdi style and ejb style) be invoked? Will the instance need
>> to be passed back to EJB container together with all CDI
>> interceptors (get hold of them via
>> EjbEndpointServiceImpl.java) and EJB container needs to
>> manage the interceptors being invoked?
> For interception type other than @AroundConstruct we leave it
> up to the EJB implementation to handle interception.
> Information about CDI interceptors is exposed to the EJB
> implementation via EjbServices.registerInterceptors()
>>
>> 4)In Weld spec, it says you must register the
>> SessionBeanInterceptor as the inner most interceptor in the
>> stack for all EJBS. Can you clarify what inner most means?
>> Does this interceptor need to be the first EJB interceptor to
>> be called or the last EJB interceptor to be invoked?
> Not sure why it says inner most - it should be outer most
> instead that is it should be called as first so that the
> @RequestScope is available for the other interceptors called
> later in the chain.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Emily
>> =================
>> Emily Jiang
>> ejiang at apache.org <mailto:ejiang at apache.org>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> ejiang at apache.org <mailto:ejiang at apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> ejiang at apache.org <mailto:ejiang at apache.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20150521/bb7773cd/attachment.html
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list