[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1906) The stateful wokring memory should be unique per message correlation number
by Jiri Pechanec (JIRA)
The stateful wokring memory should be unique per message correlation number
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1906
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-1906
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Content Based Routing
Affects Versions: 4.4
Reporter: Jiri Pechanec
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4 CP1
For me it seems probably much more useful to provide also option to have stateful rule service organized on different basis.
Each message should contain correlation identifier and the stateful session will be created per the correlation identifier.
It will server much better the intent that is described in excerpt from Service documentation
----- These can be added directly by an ESB aware client. A non-ESB aware client would have to communicate the position of the message (first, ongoing, last) in the data, and an action class would need to be added to the pipeline to add the properties to the ESB message (see quickstarts/business_ruleservice_stateful for an example of this type of service).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1721) Add MSSQL config files
by Martin Vecera (JIRA)
Add MSSQL config files
----------------------
Key: JBESB-1721
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1721
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Message Store, Registry and Repository
Affects Versions: 4.2.1 CP2
Reporter: Martin Vecera
Assigned To: Tom Cunningham
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.2.1 CP3
Add following configuration files to support MSSQL:
deploy/jbossesb.esb/message-store-sql/mssql
deploy/jbossesb.sar/juddi-sql/mssql
deploy/jbossesb.sar/lib/juddi-2.0rc5.jar/juddi-sql/mssql
For juddi we are experimenting with files copied from sybase config. The server is able to start with that. We will know more after running the tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-849) Should smooks test be an integration test?
by Mark Little (JIRA)
Should smooks test be an integration test?
------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-849
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-849
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Testing
Affects Versions: 4.2 Milestone Release 3
Reporter: Mark Little
Assigned To: Tom Fennelly
Priority: Trivial
[java] [junit] 10:22:35,254 ERROR [main][SmooksInstanceManager] Lookup of the JMS ConnectionFactory failed for the Transformation configuration Update Listener. Update listener not enabled!
[java] [junit] org.jboss.soa.esb.ConfigurationException: JNDI lookup of JMS Connection Factory [ConnectionFactory] failed.
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksInstanceManager$ConfigurationUpdateListener.getJmsConnectionFactory(SmooksInstanceManager.java:161)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksInstanceManager$ConfigurationUpdateListener.connect(SmooksInstanceManager.java:203)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksInstanceManager$ConfigurationUpdateListener.<init>(SmooksInstanceManager.java:122)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksInstanceManager$ConfigurationUpdateListener.<init>(SmooksInstanceManager.java:109)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksInstanceManager.<init>(SmooksInstanceManager.java:67)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksTransformer.initialiseLocalSmooksInstanceManager(SmooksTransformer.java:236)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksTransformer.initialise(SmooksTransformer.java:218)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksTransformerUnitTest.transform(SmooksTransformerUnitTest.java:82)
[java] [junit] at org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.converters.SmooksTransformerUnitTest.test_trans(SmooksTransformerUnitTest.java:69)
indicates that the test needs JMS set up beforehand. So doesn't that tend to imply it's an integration test?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1711) ESB unit test suite hangs when run against SOA-P CP1
by Aleksandar Kostadinov (JIRA)
ESB unit test suite hangs when run against SOA-P CP1
----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1711
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1711
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Testing
Reporter: Aleksandar Kostadinov
Assigned To: Aleksandar Kostadinov
unzip SOA-P distribution in $WORKSPACE/jbosssoa
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.server.home "$WORKSPACE/jbosssoa/jboss-as"
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.server.config $SERVER_NAME
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.hostname dev39.qa.atl.jboss.com
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.user user
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.pwd pass
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.dir /esb-in-soa
then:
cd product
ant org.jboss.esb.integration.test
Test suite hangs after first few tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1438) JMS Courrier does not support transacted mode
by Jiri Pechanec (JIRA)
JMS Courrier does not support transacted mode
---------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1438
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1438
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Process flow, Rosetta
Affects Versions: 4.2.1
Reporter: Jiri Pechanec
Assigned To: Mark Little
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.2.1 CP1
JMS Courrier (deliver side) operates only with non-transacted queue sessions. This prevents jBPM integration to work correctly. The problem can be sketched this way
1) The message is received via JMS/JCA listener, transaction is started
2) jBPM process is invoked
3) jBPM process sends message (calls service) in non-transacted mode
Three situations can happen
1) Exception is thrown later, it means that global transaction is rolled back but another service was already invoked - BUG
2) jBPM process goes to the wait state and waits for response from ESB, global transaction is committed, called service sends back signal to continue process - OK
3) jBPM process goes to the wait state and waits for response from ESB, called service sends back signal to continue process - but the global transaction was not committed yet - BUG
This is key feature to have ESB/jBPM integration working safely.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1164) Crash creates multiple EPRs for same service in JUDDI
by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)
Crash creates multiple EPRs for same service in JUDDI
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1164
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1164
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Registry and Repository
Affects Versions: 4.2.1 IR1
Reporter: Tom Cunningham
Assigned To: Mark Little
If the AS or ESB server crashes or does not cleanly shut down, JUDDI will duplicate EPR records in its database table. For the monitoring/management console, this is a real problem because it depends on the fact that there will be only one EPR for its services per ESB server.
Post-crash, every time the console tries to collect data, it is getting back results from multiple EPRs on the same machine, which is causing ConstraintViolations when we try to store results. This is causing JBESB-1139.
JUDDI should probably clean up EPR records post-crash.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1590) Review File lifecycle management in the FileGateway
by Tom Fennelly (JIRA)
Review File lifecycle management in the FileGateway
---------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1590
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1590
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Transports
Affects Versions: 4.2.1 CP1
Reporter: Tom Fennelly
Fix For: 4.2.1 CP2
Task JBESB-1568 identified an issue thrown up by the scheduler code, but in doing so also highlighted a secondary issue in the way that the gateway itself manages the lifecycles of the files it is processing. Specifically... when a file "disappears" while that instance of the gateway is processing it (or about to process it).
This could happen through a single FileGateway config before JBESB-1568 was fixed, but can still happen when multiple gateways are configured to process the same fileset in the same directory.
The gateway should handle such contention issue more cleanly.
Should it support multiple gateway instances processing a single fileset in a single directory? This could be a head wrecker to get right *and prove right* on all platforms! We could just document this as something that's not supported. It should def be able to handle different filesets in the same dir using multiple gateway instances!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 2 months