November 2012 - esb-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3862) AbstractBpm5Action is registering handlers too freely

by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)

Tom Cunningham created JBESB-3862: ------------------------------------- Summary: AbstractBpm5Action is registering handlers too freely Key: JBESB-3862 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3862 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Process flow Reporter: Tom Cunningham -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

2
15
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3772) SyncServiceInvoker does not reset ReplyTo and FaultTo EPR when deliverSync is succesful

by Duncan Doyle (JIRA)

Duncan Doyle created JBESB-3772: ----------------------------------- Summary: SyncServiceInvoker does not reset ReplyTo and FaultTo EPR when deliverSync is succesful Key: JBESB-3772 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3772 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Rosetta Affects Versions: 4.10 CP1, 4.10 Environment: Fedora 16 x86_64, JBoss SOA-P 5.2.0, HornetQ TechPreview, Reporter: Duncan Doyle I have a number of chained async, one-way services, which all use transacted JCA (with HornetQ tech preview). I set a generic "FaultTo" EPR in a custom composer-class set on the FS-Provider of the first service (entry point into the ESB), with the intention that, if any of async, one-way services fail, the Fault Message will be sent to my FaultService. One of my one-way services uses a SyncServiceInvoker to do a request-response call, in the middle of its action pipeline to a synchronous request-response service for message validation. The result is then used in the same pipeline to do some CBR. The problem is that, when I pass the message to the SyncServiceInvoker (which is configured to suspend the transaction), the ReplyTo and FaultTo headers get set to 'null' (as expected, as the synchronous request-response service needs to pass its reply and fault message to the caller), however, these ReplyTo and FaultTo headers never get set back to their original value if the call succeeds. In the exception flow of SyncServiceInvoker, the ReplyTo and FaultTo do get reset to their original value (with the remark that this is not actually necessary, which is wrong). So, when my CBR routes the message to the next service, the ReplyTo and FaultTo headers are null, implying that the async, one-way services will not sent a possible Fault Message to the FaultService. In my opinion, resetting the ReplyTo and FaultTo headers needs to be done in the 'finally' block, not the 'exception' block. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

6
30
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3796) Exception handling after SyncServiceInvoker fails

by Jason Shepherd (JIRA)

Jason Shepherd created JBESB-3796: ------------------------------------- Summary: Exception handling after SyncServiceInvoker fails Key: JBESB-3796 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3796 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Rosetta Affects Versions: 4.10 Environment: SOA Platform 5.2.0 Reporter: Jason Shepherd Attachments: SupportCase00634223.zip I have an EBWS based service which is using the SyncServiceInvoker to call a second service. This all works fine but if I throw an exception after the SyncServiceInvoker call the exception is not propagated to the client as a soap fault. However if I remove the invocation of the SyncServiceInvoker and throw an exception, a soap fault is sent to the client. I have attached a test project which demonstrates this. To see the fault just comment out the SyncServiceInvoker call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

5
27
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3838) Http Provider returns 200 http response code for Soap Fault

by Jason Shepherd (JIRA)

Jason Shepherd created JBESB-3838: ------------------------------------- Summary: Http Provider returns 200 http response code for Soap Fault Key: JBESB-3838 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3838 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 4.10 Environment: SOA-P 5.2.0 CXF WS stack Reporter: Jason Shepherd When a pipeline includes a SOAPProcessor action which calls a Web Service, if the wrapped web service returns a soap fault, and HTTP response code 500, the HTTP Provider Gateway returns a response code 200 to an ESB Client, instead of the expected 500 response. This seems contrary to the WS-I 1.0 Basic Profile specification, and breaks some Spring WS Clients. This issue does not happen with a JBR-Provider using the HTTP protocol. The expected 500 response code is returned by it. You can use the attached project to reproduce the issue. 1. Replace the 'webservice_producer' quickstart in SOA-P 5.2 samples/quickstart directory with the one attached. 2. Run 'ant clean deploy' to deploy it to a running instance 3. Run 'ant runtest' to send a WS Request to the HTTP Provider gateway. When I hit the GoodbyeWorldWS directly with SOAPUI I can see that I get a 500 HTTP response code. However in the output of the test, I can see the response of the HTTP Provider was 200: runtest: [echo] Http Client [java] Request payload: [java] <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:good="http://webservice_producer/goodbyeworld"> [java] <soapenv:Header/> [java] <soapenv:Body> [java] <good:sayGoodbye> [java] <message>goodbye</message> [java] </good:sayGoodbye> [java] </soapenv:Body> [java] </soapenv:Envelope> [java] -------------------------- [java] [java] 16:30:38,927 DEBUG [main][header] >> "POST /Quickstart_webservice_producer/http/test/x HTTP/1.1[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,970 DEBUG [main][header] >> "Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][header] >> "User-Agent: Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][header] >> "Host: localhost:8080[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][header] >> "Content-Length: 292[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][header] >> "[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][content] >> "<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:good="http://webservice_producer/goodbyeworld">[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][content] >> " <soapenv:Header/>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][content] >> " <soapenv:Body>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][content] >> " <good:sayGoodbye>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,973 DEBUG [main][content] >> " <message>goodbye</message>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,974 DEBUG [main][content] >> " </good:sayGoodbye>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,974 DEBUG [main][content] >> " </soapenv:Body>[\n]" [java] 16:30:38,974 DEBUG [main][content] >> "</soapenv:Envelope>" [java] 16:30:39,265 DEBUG [main][header] << "HTTP/1.1 200 OK[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,266 DEBUG [main][header] << "HTTP/1.1 200 OK[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,267 DEBUG [main][header] << "Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,267 DEBUG [main][header] << "X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.5; JBoss-5.0/JBossWeb-2.1[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,267 DEBUG [main][header] << "asyncServiceInvoke: false[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,267 DEBUG [main][header] << "Content-Length: 298[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,268 DEBUG [main][header] << "Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:30:39 GMT[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,268 DEBUG [main][header] << "[\r][\n]" [java] 16:30:39,273 DEBUG [main][content] << "<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><soap:Fault><faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode><faultstring>app exception!</faultstring><detail><ns1:AppException xmlns:ns1="http://webservice_producer/goodbyeworld" /></detail" [java] 16:30:39,273 DEBUG [main][content] << "></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>" [java] [java] Response Status Code: 200 [java] Response payload: [java] <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><soap:Fault><faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode><faultstring>app exception!</faultstring><detail><ns1:AppException xmlns:ns1="http://webservice_producer/goodbyeworld" /></detail></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope> [java] -------------------------- [java] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

7
35
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3876) Action Processing Pipeline Interceptors throw too many interceptEnding events

by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)

Tom Cunningham created JBESB-3876: ------------------------------------- Summary: Action Processing Pipeline Interceptors throw too many interceptEnding events Key: JBESB-3876 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3876 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Tom Cunningham -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

2
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3872) Reformat exception in SOAPClient on http 500

by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)

Tom Cunningham created JBESB-3872: ------------------------------------- Summary: Reformat exception in SOAPClient on http 500 Key: JBESB-3872 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3872 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Tom Cunningham -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 4 months

2
15
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3882) FileUtils.renameTo should return false

by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)

Tom Cunningham created JBESB-3882: ------------------------------------- Summary: FileUtils.renameTo should return false Key: JBESB-3882 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3882 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Rosetta Affects Versions: 4.11 Reporter: Tom Cunningham Fix For: 4.12 The problem is that FileUtil.renameTo(..) returns true even if it fails to rename the file (in the step where it renames a localfile to a filename that includes the UUID). This in turn makes setFileWorking(..) return a non-null value and AbstractFileGateway will go ahead and try to process the non-existing file. I propose that FileUtil.renameTo(..) should in these cases return false thus AbstractFileGateway will NOT try to process a non-existing file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 5 months

2
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3881) FileUtils.renameTo should return false

by Tom Cunningham (JIRA)

Tom Cunningham created JBESB-3881: ------------------------------------- Summary: FileUtils.renameTo should return false Key: JBESB-3881 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3881 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Tom Cunningham -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3802) Rewrite schemas imported by SOAPProcessor to point to locally cached versions

by Jason Shepherd (JIRA)

Jason Shepherd created JBESB-3802: ------------------------------------- Summary: Rewrite schemas imported by SOAPProcessor to point to locally cached versions Key: JBESB-3802 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3802 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Web Services Affects Versions: 4.11 Environment: JBoss Enterprise SOA-P 5.2 Reporter: Jason Shepherd When wrapping an external webservice using SOAPProcessor, the contract is correctly published in the contract web application, see JBESB-3789. However any schema files imported by the wrapped web service are referenced on the wrapped web service, they are not cached by the ESB. Please cache a copy of the imported schemas locally, so that a client of the ESB does not have to contact the original, wrapped, web service to retrieve the schemas. This issue will fix will also effect JBR, HTTP gateway schemas as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 5 months

4
28
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-3884) jruby.jar as shipped with JBoss ESB exposes CVE-2012-5370

by David Jorm (JIRA)

David Jorm created JBESB-3884: --------------------------------- Summary: jruby.jar as shipped with JBoss ESB exposes CVE-2012-5370 Key: JBESB-3884 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3884 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: David Jorm jruby.jar as shipped with JBoss ESB exposes CVE-2012-5370. We are shipping JRuby 1.6.5.1. The upstream Ruby language has replaced the vulnerable Murmur hash function / algorithm implementation with the SipHash-2-4 implementation: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2012/11/09/ruby19-hashdos-cve-2012-5371/ An upstream fix is not yet available for JRuby. Once an upstream fix is available, we should incorporate it into a future release via a component upgrade. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 5 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

esb-issues November 2012