[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-659) 2 JBossAS instances cannot share the same JBossMQ service for JMS gateways if JMS is installed
by James Williams (JIRA)
2 JBossAS instances cannot share the same JBossMQ service for JMS gateways if JMS is installed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-659
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-659
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Environment: JBossAS 4.2GA, JBossESB - Head as of 07/05.2007.
Reporter: James Williams
Assigned To: Mark Little
I am trying to get 2 JBossAS instances to share the same JMS Server for gateways. There's a lot of moving parts, but I'll try to explain the configurations:
1. JBossAS 4.2.0-GA default config with all .ESB archives, minus the quickstart_helloworld.esb. This server is started using the "-b localhost -c node0" startup parameters.
2. JBossAS 4.2.0-GA default config with "jbossesb.sar" and "quickstart_helloworld.esb". All other .ESB archives are removed and my goal is to use the JMS service in server #1 for gateways/listeners. The quickstart_helloworld.esb archive in this server has its own gateway/listener queues. This server is started using the "-b 192.168.200.1 -c node1" startup parameters.
3. JBossAS 4.2-GA default config with "jbossesb.sar" and "quickstart_helloworld.esb". All other .ESB archives are removed and my goal is to use the JMS service in server #1 for gateways/listeners. The quickstart_helloworld.esb archive in this server has its own gateway/listener queues that are different from the gateways/listeners in #2. This server is started using the "-b 192.168.200.2 -c node2" startup parameters.
I'm not having any problems with nodes #2 and #3 sharing the JMS service that's running on #1, so long as JBossMQ isn't installed on node #2 or #3. If JMS is installed, quickstart_helloworld.esb archive fails to deploy on both #2 or #3. It complains that the Gateway queue does not exist, but it most certainly does. Worse yet, when I run the SendJMSMessage test class, it cannot find the queue either. It's as if jbossesb.sar is somehow screwing up all jndi lookups for the queue.
There are a couple things I've done to try to rule out other potential root causes:
1. I tried running #1, #2, #3 w/out any .ESB archives or jbossesb.sar to verify that a JMS client can indeed drop requests into queues on all servers. To me, this validates that 3 unclustered JBossAS instances can each have their own JMS queues that are all accessible on a single machine, like my test environment, just by having the app servers bootstrapped by unique config and ip address. I was worried that the JMS service might be the culprit, but that doesn't appear to be the case.
2. I removed JMS from #2 and #3 to verify that the queues are setup correctly on #1 and to verify that #2 and #3 can indeed share the same JMS service provided they do not have JMS running themselves.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-476) Make action, listener etc configuration setting by setter method the default
by Tom Fennelly (JIRA)
Make action, listener etc configuration setting by setter method the default
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-476
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-476
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter: Tom Fennelly
Assigned To: Mark Little
Fix For: 4.2
We currently configure everything by constructor. This is not great for a number of reasons:
1. It can't be compile time validated.
2. Not as "obvious" to someone developing against the API. If in an interface, their IDE (or at least compiler - if using a stone ax) will complain immediately that they're not implementing the interface correctly.
3. Makes our code a little bit more complicated re the reflection code that needs to be implemented.
So I suggest making the interface (that all these things implement) contain a setter method that takes the config. The mandate on the implementation is that they contain a public default constructor.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-652) Refactory JMSRouter to simplfy setting properties on JMSMessage from ESB Message object
by Daniel Bevenius (JIRA)
Refactory JMSRouter to simplfy setting properties on JMSMessage from ESB Message object
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-652
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-652
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Daniel Bevenius
Assigned To: Mark Little
Priority: Minor
The use case for this is that we need to set the correlation id of the JMSMessage before it is sent by the JMSRouter.
We have previously subclassed JMSRouter but this was not the best solution as we needed to override the route method and duplicate most of the code.
I would be nice to have a method that would be called from the route method that looked something like this:
setJMSProperties ( jmsMessage, esbMsg );
The default implementation could do nothing but would let subclasses only override this method.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 10 months