[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-2285) Service Repository support not Servicen Registry cause it is provide by JUDDI
by Daniel F?rberg (JIRA)
Service Repository support not Servicen Registry cause it is provide by JUDDI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-2285
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-2285
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Web Services
Affects Versions: 4.4
Environment: JBoss ESB 4.4 or SOA Platform 4.3
Reporter: Daniel F?rberg
Fix For: 4.4
Attachments: techneutralsynchbus.jpg
Actually i was at the partner talk about JBoss ESB at Devoxx 08 in Antwerp. And some questions
about the support the ws-stack and Service Repositories which provides an Api that can fullfill
som of our customers needs regarding implementation of SOA. I spoke to an representative in
Exibition hall from France and got some information. It ended up here raising JIRA, as a feature
request. The software Mark Little recomended was SOA Software which is a comercial product.
We do only work with open source at the company i work for, so it's not an option. Mark mention
little about the DNA project. I have been i contact with a local represnative here in Sweden at
Redhat also. It ended up that i sucessfully created an overview architecture with WSO2 instead.
But were a little bit late, they already started the dev with Mule. I wanted to continue with, as
long as they are not satisfied with Mule. We can meet up, cause we have the trust.
Anyhow back to require this customer have:
Lockup support of servicecontracts both in design- and runtime
Adminstarte service registry/repository containing servicecontract and
other metadata of interest including user acess control and authorization(WS-policy based, XACML)
WS-Policy or correspondant support for implicit autentication and authorization of
systems or services
Scheduled publising/unpublishing of wenbservices without need for restart
Adjust opening hours for services(service activation)
and i provide a sketch of the suggested solution:
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-1711) ESB unit test suite hangs when run against SOA-P CP1
by Aleksandar Kostadinov (JIRA)
ESB unit test suite hangs when run against SOA-P CP1
----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1711
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1711
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Testing
Reporter: Aleksandar Kostadinov
Assigned To: Aleksandar Kostadinov
unzip SOA-P distribution in $WORKSPACE/jbosssoa
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.server.home "$WORKSPACE/jbosssoa/jboss-as"
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.server.config $SERVER_NAME
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.hostname dev39.qa.atl.jboss.com
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.user user
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.pwd pass
chprop product.properties org.jboss.esb.test.ftp.dir /esb-in-soa
then:
cd product
ant org.jboss.esb.integration.test
Test suite hangs after first few tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-2269) Action instantiation - configuration injection using BeanConfiguredAction or annotations
by Morten Hattesen (JIRA)
Action instantiation - configuration injection using BeanConfiguredAction or annotations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-2269
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-2269
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Configuration
Affects Versions: 4.4 CP1
Reporter: Morten Hattesen
Priority: Minor
Change the way ESB actions are configured/instantiated, to allow Actions that implement ActionPipelineProcessor (subclasses of AbstractActionPipelineProcessor) automatically have action properties injected directly by simply implementing BeanConfiguredAction.
Alternatively, property injection could be performed by adding runtime-retained annotations to the actions.
Any of the above changes would make creating custom actions easier, since action properties would be directly injected into the action bean using setter-style injection.
As a consequence of implementing (either of) the above change, out-of-the-box actions should be updated, where relevant.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-2268) Actions that implement BeanConfiguredAction are instantiated for every process() invocation
by Morten Hattesen (JIRA)
Actions that implement BeanConfiguredAction are instantiated for every process() invocation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-2268
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-2268
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Configuration
Affects Versions: 4.4 CP1
Reporter: Morten Hattesen
Priority: Minor
Whereas actions that extend ActionPipelineProcessor are instantiated once per action, and the process() method called on this instance, the lifecycle of actions that implement BeanConfiguredAction is entirely different, which is NOT clear from documentation or JavaDoc.
An action that implements BeanConfiguredAction is instantiated on every call to the process() method, making it impossible to maintain state across invocations. This effectively renders this way of configuring Actions useless for anything but the most simple actions, since lazy-initialization is made impossible (unless static scope is employed).
I see absolutely no argument for retaining the current instance-per-invocation lifecycle at all.
I propose to change org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.message.BeanConfigActionProcessor to maintain a single processor instance variable on which the process method is invoked, in the same way it is done by the org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.message.OverriddenActionPipelineProcessor (used when an action implements ActionPipelineProcessor, which is the case on AbstractActionPipelineProcessor).
Alternatively, it should be made absolutely clear in the ESB documentation, that actions that implement BeanConfiguredAction have an instance-per-invocation lifecycle, which will typically have serious performance-implications since no action-state can be maintained.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 3 months