[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-501) remove action pipeline
by Mark Little (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Mark Little closed JBESB-501.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Done
> remove action pipeline
> ----------------------
>
> Key: JBESB-501
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-501
> Project: JBoss ESB
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Rosetta
> Affects Versions: 4.2 Milestone Release 1
> Environment: any
> Reporter: Kurt Stam
> Assignee: Mark Little
> Time Spent: 5 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> I think we should discourage action pipelining as it muddies to waters. I think each action should be it's own service, and that all communication is service2service. This way each .esb archive does not have to package up all the Smooks jar (and dependencies). If we think this adds to much overhead then we should fix this by adding smarts to our framework, where it figures out if it can make a local call (go over a local transport). It also muddies the waters from the perspective of a service description if we allow action chaining.
> This also removes the need for TwoWayCouriers, since we might as well forward it onto the next service, in stead of replying to the current one. I do think we should make an option for a blocking gateway, where the gateway waits for a a reply from an ESB Service.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (JBESB-740) Allow for different message types on the same bus
by Mark Little (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Mark Little closed JBESB-740.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Out of Date
> Allow for different message types on the same bus
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBESB-740
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-740
> Project: JBoss ESB
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Rosetta
> Affects Versions: 4.2 Milestone Release 3
> Reporter: Mark Little
> Assignee: Mark Little
>
> It was always the aim to support different message formats (e.g., not just Java serializable!) We do that, but unfortunately none of the senders/receivers use anything other than the default message format (serializable). So it's not possible to send multiple types over the same ESB deploymend.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 1 month