[esb-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBESB-3453) OGNLUtils.assertIsCollection fails

OGNLUtils.assertIsCollection fails ---------------------------------- Key: JBESB-3453 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBESB-3453 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Components: Rosetta Affects Versions: 4.5 Reporter: jarkko Lietolahti Assignee: Magesh Kumar B Fix For: 4.7 CP3 The method {code} private static boolean assertIsCollection(Element element) { if(element.getAttributeNS(JBOSSESB_SOAP_NS, IS_COLLECTION_ATTRIB).equals("true")) { // It's already been attributed... no need to check for the soapui comment... return true; } Comment firstComment = (Comment) YADOMUtil.getFirstChildByType(element, Node.COMMENT_NODE); // TODO: Get Ole (soapUI) to add an attribute to the collection element - better than looking for this comment. if(firstComment != null && firstComment.getTextContent().indexOf("1 or more repetitions") != -1) { return true; } return false; } {code} Especially row; Comment firstComment = (Comment) YADOMUtil.getFirstChildByType(element, Node.COMMENT_NODE); is causing a grief. Given an WSDL like below; <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" > <soapenv:Header/> <soapenv:Body> <QueryRequest> <username>?</username> <password>?</password> <Customer id="?" telcoid="?"/> <!--1 or more repetitions:--> <productIds>?</productIds> <isLookup>?</isLookup> <maxWaitTime>?</maxWaitTime> </QueryRequest> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> OGNLUtils creates ognlExpression QueryRequest[0] for all the elements below QueryRequest. E.g. ognl for username, password etc is "QueryRequest[0]" for username and also "QueryRequest[0]" for password, when in reality it should be QueryRequest.username , QueryRequest.password etc.. This is caused by the array element LATER in the WSDL; <!--1 or more repetitions:--> <productIds>?</productIds> combined with the Comment firstComment = (Comment) YADOMUtil.getFirstChildByType(element, Node.COMMENT_NODE); which somehow finds the "<!-- 1 or .." later in the wsdl. I think.