]
Tom Fennelly updated JBESB-1205:
--------------------------------
Attachment: webservice_transformer_v2.zip
Hey James.
Issue #1 re the null response received back on the JBossRemoting client.... I changed the
client code to use HttpClient and that fixed that. Didn't look into that any
further.
Issue #2 re the transformation... using the Javabeans for this particular transform is
overkill for sure. As an alternate approach, I added a straightforward Java based DOM
transform (attached). Take a look and let me know what you think.
Re XSLT + namespaces etc... there is a way to do what you want with XSLT, but it's a
bit of a pain in the ass. It also means you have to define a full stylesheet i.e you
can't use a templatelet.
webservice_producer returns null result and a question about proper
smooks and webservice_producer use
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-1205
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-1205
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Examples
Affects Versions: 4.2
Environment: Tested on both ESB Head as of 10/18/2007 and 4.2.0GA, using JBossWS
2.0.0 and JBossAS 4.2.1 on FedoraCore 6 and on Mac OS X.
Reporter: James Williams
Assigned To: Tom Fennelly
Fix For: 4.2.1
Attachments: startfrom-java.war, webservice_transformer.zip,
webservice_transformer_v2.zip
I created a simple quickstart to test a common WSDL and Java mismatch issue with
webservices. WSDL centric development makes using JWS annotations very difficult if there
is existing Java code. I want to use smooks + webservice_producer to fix this issue. The
goal is to define a WSDL interface with disregard to the POJO backend. Then, use smooks to
transform the SOAP payload to match the WSDL that JWS generates for the existing POJOs. I
started with the webservice_producer quickstart. I stripped away the socket and JMS
gateways and added a smooks transformation action. The transformation action modfies the
SOAP payload so that it conforms the JWS generated WSDL. My transformation logic is really
simplistic, but I have two outstanding issues with my approach. One has a workaround, the
other problem is likely an ESB bug hence the JIRA ticket.
The first issue is related to the smooks logic. I had to create a POJO placeholder and a
smooks template because my WSDL has nested namespaces. I was unable to use a simple XSL
snippet because the element that I need to change has a namespaced sub-element. The XSL
parser chokes because the namespace of the sub-element isn't XSL recognizable. I
don't think there is anyway around this issue by using an XSL resource type like the
"XML2XML_simple" quickstart. But, I would like to know if there's a better,
more elegant way to write smooks-res.xml tansformer logic. In particular, I want to ditch
the POJO DTO. I suspect groovy is the best way to go, but I'm unsure of performance
ramifications and the correct way to implement this type of transformer.
The second issue is related to the http invocation. On jbossesb-4.2-GA, the http invoker
returns prematurely. The transformation logic executes, then a transformed payload
response is sent back to the http endpoint. Then the webservice executes using the
transformed payload and returns the correct response. But, the http endpoint has already
received it's response. I also tried esb-head and as of 10/18, a null response is
returned. I also tested the webservice_producer quickstart and got the same null response.
I suspect you are working on this code right now and might be fixing the issue I found,
but I wanted to add a jira just in case.
I would like to know if the smook-res.xml logic in my quickstart can be written in a more
elegant fashion. Once, I resolve this issue on my end, the SA team will have a nice
webservice_transformer quickstart and I will clean up the code, submit a jira request with
the quickstart code and assign it to Kevin Conner.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: