Hi JBoss guys,
I'm the creator of AngularJS Eclipse and Mickael Istria suggested me to contact you.
At first, I would like to apologize because Max pinged me on tweeter and I have not seen that-( Sorry!
I would like to answer about some comments :
>It provides ng-* completion which we do too. And IMO ours is better
>since we provide context-dependent code completion.
>For example we suggest count/when/... attributes only for ng-pluralize
>directives (<ANY ng-pluralize> or <ng-pluralize>)
>Or ng-maxlength only for input directives. Or we don't suggest ng-app if
>it's already defined in any parent tag. Etc. So we analyze the context
>when calculating what can be suggested in the particular place.
Except for "ng-app if it's already defined in any parent tag", AngularJS Eclipse manages that :
>It does not provide code completion for {{}} expressions which we plan to do in JBT 4.2.
>The upstream project
>supposed to provide some angular specific code completion in *.js files
>but I couldn't manage to make it work.
AngularJS Eclipse extends the WTP HTML Editor (I don't have created a new HTML editor).
I would like tell you about pros and cons for using tern :
The cons for using tern :
* needs node.js
* written in Javascript, so it's difficult to debug it with Eclipse. But tern works in the browser, so I use Chrome to develop the angular plugin.
The pros for using tern :
* tern provides plugin/defintions for ecma5, jquery, node, angular.
* as tern is written in Javascript, the community is very big.
Hope my information will be useful for you.
Regards Angelo