Nice. Your aerogear-security module is a good way to abstract implementations/security providers. The demo is using picketlink-extensions impl, right (aerogear-security-picketbox) ? Regards. Pedro Igor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 8:41:58 PM Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08 Hi Pedro, Shane helped me this week to get our demo working, if you want to take a sneak peak http://controller-abstractj.rhcloud.com/aerogear-controller-demo/ Sources at: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo and switched to the latest timed releases. I'll work on the next week testing HTTP digest/LDAP authentication. -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile On Friday, February 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote: Hi, Today, we released a new timed version for the PicketLink IDM project. The documentation and quickstarts are being elaborated, but you can always check the test cases for a lot of usage examples. <dependency> <groupId>org.picketlink</groupId> <artifactId>picketlink-idm-impl</artifactId> <version>3.0.0-2013Feb08</version> </dependency> This version contains the changes required to support the last discussion regarding groups with the same name and group's path. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-89 Regards. Pedro Igor _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

I agree. With Picketlink in place, it should be the prefered solution for CDI environments. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 11:52:30 AM Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08 Nope, the demo made use of PicketLink extensions in the past. Now the purpose is to use PicketLink only, digging into the sources, I can't see any good reasons to use PicketLink extensions. -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile On Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote: Nice. Your aerogear-security module is a good way to abstract implementations/security providers. The demo is using picketlink-extensions impl, right (aerogear-security-picketbox) ? Regards. Pedro Igor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Oliveira" < bruno(a)abstractj.org > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" < psilva(a)redhat.com > Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 8:41:58 PM Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08 Hi Pedro, Shane helped me this week to get our demo working, if you want to take a sneak peak http://controller-abstractj.rhcloud.com/aerogear-controller-demo/ Sources at: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo and switched to the latest timed releases. I'll work on the next week testing HTTP digest/LDAP authentication. -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile On Friday, February 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote: Hi, Today, we released a new timed version for the PicketLink IDM project. The documentation and quickstarts are being elaborated, but you can always check the test cases for a lot of usage examples. <dependency> <groupId>org.picketlink</groupId> <artifactId>picketlink-idm-impl</artifactId> <version>3.0.0-2013Feb08</version> </dependency> This version contains the changes required to support the last discussion regarding groups with the same name and group's path. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-89 Regards. Pedro Igor _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev