Hi, Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. Stuart

+1 Please make the move - getting it moved is a one off task and once moved it is one less project we need SVN for ;-) On 23/01/14 13:14, Stuart Douglas wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. > > Stuart >

https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox-container This has been there for a few months now. I am trying to dodge my memory as to why we did not use it to upgrade in WF8. Maybe Stefan remembers. I guess it was something to do with the plan to discard very old code and refactor it to just include what is necessary for WF. I think we did not have enough time to go with the plan yet. Definitely will be the PBox repo in WF9+. On 01/23/2014 09:14 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote: > +1 Please make the move - getting it moved is a one off task and once > moved it is one less project we need SVN for ;-) > > > On 23/01/14 13:14, Stuart Douglas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. >> >> Stuart >> _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

Next week for sure. > On Apr 14, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Do you guys have any update on the time frame for this? > > Stuart > > Anil Saldhana wrote: >> https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox-container >> >> This has been there for a few months now. I am trying to dodge my >> memory as to why we did not use it to >> upgrade in WF8. Maybe Stefan remembers. >> >> I guess it was something to do with the plan to discard very old code >> and refactor it to just include what is necessary for WF. >> I think we did not have enough time to go with the plan yet. >> >> Definitely will be the PBox repo in WF9+. >> >> >>> On 01/23/2014 09:14 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote: >>> +1 Please make the move - getting it moved is a one off task and once >>> moved it is one less project we need SVN for ;-) >>> >>> >>>> On 23/01/14 13:14, Stuart Douglas wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. >>>> >>>> Stuart >>>>

So is the old SVN repo still going to be used for EAP 6 related work? If so why, as it will mean patches have to be applied in two different systems. Stuart Anil Saldhana wrote: > Here is the github workspace after migration > https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox > > This workspace is to be used exclusively for WildFly. > > Eventually, I think we should bump the version to PicketBox 6.x for > WildFly9+ (Stefan can make the call) > > (PicketBox 5 was an intermediate effort at Java SE security framework > which eventually got consolidated in PicketLink). > > > On 04/14/2014 08:26 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote: >> Next week for sure. >> >>> On Apr 14, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>> Do you guys have any update on the time frame for this? >>> >>> Stuart >>> >>> Anil Saldhana wrote: >>>> https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox-container >>>> >>>> This has been there for a few months now. I am trying to dodge my >>>> memory as to why we did not use it to >>>> upgrade in WF8. Maybe Stefan remembers. >>>> >>>> I guess it was something to do with the plan to discard very old code >>>> and refactor it to just include what is necessary for WF. >>>> I think we did not have enough time to go with the plan yet. >>>> >>>> Definitely will be the PBox repo in WF9+. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 01/23/2014 09:14 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote: >>>>> +1 Please make the move - getting it moved is a one off task and once >>>>> moved it is one less project we need SVN for ;-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 23/01/14 13:14, Stuart Douglas wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much >>>>>> easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stuart >>>>>> >>>>>>

https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox I pushed all branches and tags. So I think this is an exact replica of the svn repository. Process followed is in gist: https://gist.github.com/anilsaldhana/11271541

On 04/24/2014 04:20 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote: > Stuart, > the svn git migration process was choking on some branches of > PicketBox SVN. > So I did not migrate the branches over. Just the trunk and tags. > > I will try to do this entire process again with just migrating to recent > branches. :( > > Regards, > Anil > > On 04/24/2014 02:31 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote: >> So is the old SVN repo still going to be used for EAP 6 related work? If >> so why, as it will mean patches have to be applied in two different >> systems. >> >> Stuart >> >> Anil Saldhana wrote: >>> Here is the github workspace after migration >>> https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox >>> >>> This workspace is to be used exclusively for WildFly. >>> >>> Eventually, I think we should bump the version to PicketBox 6.x for >>> WildFly9+ (Stefan can make the call) >>> >>> (PicketBox 5 was an intermediate effort at Java SE security framework >>> which eventually got consolidated in PicketLink). >>> >>> >>> On 04/14/2014 08:26 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote: >>>> Next week for sure. >>>> >>>>> On Apr 14, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Do you guys have any update on the time frame for this? >>>>> >>>>> Stuart >>>>> >>>>> Anil Saldhana wrote: >>>>>> https://github.com/picketbox/picketbox-container >>>>>> >>>>>> This has been there for a few months now. I am trying to dodge my >>>>>> memory as to why we did not use it to >>>>>> upgrade in WF8. Maybe Stefan remembers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess it was something to do with the plan to discard very old code >>>>>> and refactor it to just include what is necessary for WF. >>>>>> I think we did not have enough time to go with the plan yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Definitely will be the PBox repo in WF9+. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 01/23/2014 09:14 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote: >>>>>>> +1 Please make the move - getting it moved is a one off task and once >>>>>>> moved it is one less project we need SVN for ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/01/14 13:14, Stuart Douglas wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are there any plans to move Picketbox to github? It makes it much >>>>>>>> easer for people outside the security team to submit fixes etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Stuart >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>