I don't think typos in comments and things like that should need a JIRA.
Refactoring of any kind really should have a JIRA, though, IMO (although
it may not be a directly related JIRA if the refactoring is part of some
other work).
Just my .02 :)
On 01/16/2015 11:53 AM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
On a related note, would it be acceptable not to create JIRAs for
small changes like typos or changes in wording of messages? That
clutters the jira and inflates the volume of items to review
regularly. Could just a PR be enough?
Ondra
On 16.1.2015 05:11, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Hey Team,
>
> Just wanted to let you know that I did some (quite a bit of) JIRA
> cleanup. I've close a lot of old issues that hadn't seen any progress
> in a long time. That's not to say that they can't be reopened if we
> want to implement one, but I wanted to reduce the noise in JIRA and
> make it easier to find things.
>
> Additionally, I probably closed about 30 issues that were already
> completed. So let's try (as I mentioned in my other email) to do a
> better job with closing issues when they are completed.
>
> I'm going to be continuing to sort issues into the 2.0.0.Final
> version tag so that we can focus on getting this release out. I know
> I missed a few things that people are currently working on, but I'll
> get to it, or remind me and I'll put it in (or tag it yourselves.)
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev