[aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions
Hylke Bons
hbons at redhat.com
Fri Jun 21 11:33:35 EDT 2013
On 21/06/2013 15:38, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
> design is looking good.
>
> Some Comments:
>
> On the First screen after login( and subsequent detail pages ), i
> would probably remove the "View Details" button and just make the
> value in the Name column clickable. Probably makes sense to remove
> the "Remove" button too and put a "delete" icon or something next to
> the name of the app
>
> either that or when a row is clicked, those button(s) appear. More
> of an implementation detail really
>
Yea, this could be a good option as well.
I'd say we try both and see which on works best in the actual
implementation.
Thanks,
Hylke
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com
> <mailto:hbons at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've updated the wireframes with the points raised, you can find it
>> here:
>> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server_admin_ui.png
>>
>> I'll address your feedback inline.
>>
>> On 06/06/2013 01:38, Deepali Khushraj wrote:
>>> * It seems from the designs that the user can add only a single
>>> OS-specific variant per app. For example, I can create "Mobile HR"
>>> app with a single "HR iOS" variant, but not two variants like "HR
>>> iPad" and "HR iPhone free". I believe Matthias' lexicon states such
>>> multiple variants are possible per app. .
>>>
>>> I think the way you've done is fine. However, if we choose this path
>>> then, I think, we need to update the specification and ensure the
>>> REST API won't allow multiple OS-specific variants per app,
>>> otherwise, they can't be shown in the UI.
>>>
>> I forgot a to add this usecase. This can now be done in the
>> "Variants" tab.
>>
>>> * Apple's Push network has prod and dev environment options, a flag
>>> would be useful.
>>>
>>
>> Two certificate files can now be provided: one for production and one
>> for development. Any of the two can be used by mobile apps whether
>> they're deployed or for debugging purposes.
>>
>>> * The terms "Instance" and "Variant" will be unfamiliar
>>> terminologies to a new user. A help icon on the screen or just some
>>> text explaining the meanings of these terms to new comers would be
>>> helpful
>>>
>>> * Terminology suggestion:
>>> Instance -> "Active user instances" or just "User instances"
>>>
>> I've changed this to "Mobile Instances" for now, but we can discuss this.
>>
>>
>>> * I found the name "Variants and Push Networks" confusing. I would
>>> suggest we use one :)
>>>
>>
>> Push Networks it is.
>>
>>> * I noticed you added links to download client SDKs, which is great.
>>> I think a link to the Sender REST API spec would be useful too.
>>>
>> I think this is something we need to fix on the aerogear.org
>> <http://aerogear.org> website itself. There should be easy access
>> from the downloads to the API as a "next step".
>>
>>
>>> * I found our iOS tutorial to be really helpful. It got the user up
>>> and running really quickly. This is something I struggled with Urban
>>> Airship and other services. Linking ours to the console could be a
>>> real value add to first-time users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> * We need to check the security aspect of showing end-user emails in
>>> the instances tab to the developers of the app.
>>>
>> Like mentioned by Matthias, this can be anything, not just email
>> addressses. It depends on how the developer sets the system up.
>>
>>> * Also, if an app gets really popular then this list will likely be
>>> really long, like thousands of users. Not sure if our console could
>>> handle that. I think this feature of being able to see instances is
>>> great in "development mode" or during apps' "beta testing" though.
>>>
>> It can be a long list and we probably will have to add pagination and
>> filtering. The main usecase here is removing instances to stop them
>> from receiving new push notifications.
>>
>>> * Is the check-mark in first screen used to make an app active Vs
>>> inactive?
>>>
>>
>> It was to to select applications and perform actions on them. I
>> already thought this would be confusing, so I removed them now. An
>> app is active when it has at least one push network enabled.
>>
>>
>>> * I like that you show the variants summary in first screen,
>>> wondering if we could use icons there for iOS, Android & web.
>>
>> Yep, potentially.
>>
>>>
>>> * I was wondering if we could consider some UX ideas for first-time
>>> user experience. I imagine a lot of users using this service would
>>> never have used Push before, so they may need some hand holding and
>>> the UI is a great way to start that.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, I've added some paragraphs to make things more friendlier, but
>> there's room for improvement. We can fix this as we go.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. It's been really useful!
>>
>> Hylke
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130621/40f2c808/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list