[aerogear-dev] [UnifiedPush Server] Using JBoss Logging ?

Burr Sutter bsutter at redhat.com
Mon Apr 7 08:40:25 EDT 2014


Like with any dependency....we use it, we own it :-)

On Apr 7, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> JUL it is ;-)
> 
> unless we are forced to not use JUL  ;-)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:
> I can see UPS needing to run on other containers (Tomcat, WF Core, etc) and I was assuming that JBoss Logging could be picked and carried around like other logging frameworks.
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 7, 2014, at 3:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Oh, yeah - those are valid concerns.
>> 
>> Let's stick to JUL ? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I like JUL because it has no dependencies, stable API (albeit not feature
>> complete) and no class path clashes.
>> 
>> If you go with JBoss Logging, what would be the strategy for:
>> 
>> 1/ Running UPS on Server in application platform that does not provide JBoss
>> Logging?
>> 2/ JBossLogging version conflicts - WF provides version 3.2, UPS needs 3.1+ and
>> KC needs 3.0+?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Karel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 14:27:52 +0200
>> Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > right now we are using JUL for logging. That works fine, so far :-)
>> >
>> > However related projects (e.g. Keycloak / LiveOak) are using JBoss Logging.
>> > I somewhat feel that it's perhaps not a bad idea if we would use JBoss
>> > logging as well...
>> >
>> > I know there are a gazillion different Java logging frameworks out there
>> > (yikes), but my question is really: keep JUL or go with JBoss-Logging :)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140407/e79b2af3/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list