[aerogear-dev] Push server...master secrets, secrets and some refactoring proposal

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > So maybe "master secret" and "secret" are a bad naming, once it's not
> > secret? And the correct would be "API key"
>
> +1 to API key,  i believe that is what google might use



+1

variantKey (instead if secret)
AppKey (instead of masterSecret)


Sorry for the bad initial naming :-(





>
> >
> > Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> >> I compare these secrets with the API keys that Google provides for its
> >> services. When you go on their Cloud Console , you can check your API
> key
> >> along with the project number.
> >
> > --
> > abstractj
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140417/d5f23099/attachment.html