[aerogear-dev] [UPS] Misc: Node.js sender

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’
>
>
>
> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too
>
>
> while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’  i sort of didn’t want to put the
> word node in it.  if you are searching on npm/using npm to install
> something.  it’s node
>
> although, if this also has a CLI component to it,  that might make sense
> then, ‘$ unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘
>
>
> i’m so torn :)
>

he! ja, it's valid concerns!


>
> ok,  lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender'
>

soundz good to me


>
> i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought.
>

+1


>
>
>
>
>
> tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me>:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we want to also rename it.
>>>
>>> the java sender is called( in maven ),  ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’
>>>
>>> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’
>>>
>>> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or
>>> ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>>
>>
>> I like that
>>
>> +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>
>> Or unifiedpush-node-sender
>>
>>
>>> what do others think?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> :),  do we a JIRA,  i can whip something up for a guide
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Whenever Luke is ready ? :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> When?
>>>>
>>>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>> matzew at apache.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi there,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > a few questions:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > * based on
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a50e9a87161dfb39f8d3e73f7b1f1d77111e93
>>>> > >
>>>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
>>>> > >
>>>> > yes
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link
>>>> here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integration_tutorials
>>>> > >
>>>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the
>>>> > github which contains instructions.
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks!
>>>> > > Matthias
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140805/4d592476/attachment-0001.html