[aerogear-dev] [UPS] Misc: Node.js sender

[Lucas Holmquist]

On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’
>> 
>> 
>> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too
> 
> while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’  i sort of didn’t want to put the word node in it.  if you are searching on npm/using npm to install something.  it’s node
> 
> although, if this also has a CLI component to it,  that might make sense then, ‘$ unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘
> 
> 
> i’m so torn :)
> 
> he! ja, it's valid concerns!
>  
> 
> ok,  lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender'
> 
> soundz good to me 

ok,  i’ll go with it,

@matzew,  could you update the component in the AGPUSH JIRA to be UnifiedPush-node-sender 

>  
> 
> i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought.
> 
> +1
>  
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me>:
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Do we want to also rename it.
>>> 
>>> the java sender is called( in maven ),  ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’
>>> 
>>> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’
>>> 
>>> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>> 
>>> I like that
>>> 
>>> +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>> 
>>> Or unifiedpush-node-sender 
>>>  
>>> what do others think?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> :),  do we a JIRA,  i can whip something up for a guide
>>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Whenever Luke is ready ? :) 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> When?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Hi there,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > a few questions:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > * based on
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a50e9a87161dfb39f8d3e73f7b1f1d77111e93
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > yes
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integration_tutorials
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the
>>>>> > github which contains instructions.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thanks!
>>>>> > > Matthias
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > --
>>>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140805/078a94aa/attachment.html