[aerogear-dev] [iOS] small libs

[Corinne Krych]

+1
Thanks for sharing.



On 4 February 2014 17:02, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:

> I believe that CocoaPods address this concern via subspecs -
> https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/The-podspec-format
> http://guides.cocoapods.org/making/specs-and-specs-repo.html
>
> However, AIUI, this would require all Aerogear iOS related code to share
> one
> Git repository or at least have some git submodules setup. Submodule setup
> will
> be nasty for releasing new versions.
>
> PodSpec guide additionally says that spec should include all subspec by
> default,
> if user wants to be selective, he can do so by enumerating subspecs.
>
> http://guides.cocoapods.org/syntax/podspec.html#default_subspec
>
> My $0.02,
>
> Karel
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 09:11:27 +0100
> Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello iOS folks
> >
> > I've started looking at sync part, I've created a separate repo [1]. For
> now,
> > this lib is dependant on iOS-core. does is worth having it separate for
> folks
> > that what to use core without sync? Same question applies for encrypted
> > store. Right no encrypted store are part of iOS-core. do we want to
> separate
> > it for people who want core without encrypted store ? what about people
> who
> > all it all, encrypted store+sync, we'll have to manage correctly
> transitive
> > dependencies. wdty?
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> > [1] https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-sync-ios
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140204/995a30b3/attachment.html