[aerogear-dev] DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

[Lucas Holmquist]

On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Guys,
> 
> Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have:
> 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3]
> 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4]
> 
> I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync.
> 
> Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments .

in JS the read method can also be "read all",  should probably update that gist

> 
> @summers do you have a gist for java API?
> thoughts?
> 
> ++
> Corinne
> [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-not-to-pipe-td6135.html
> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408
> [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c
> [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev