[aerogear-dev] DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

[Corinne Krych]

So iOS and JS are at the same level of API fucntionalities and same method names.
we’re just left to pick a name DataSync vs SyncPipe
Let’s see for the Java version

++
Corinne
On 10 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Guys,
>> 
>> Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have:
>> 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3]
>> 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4]
>> 
>> I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync.
>> 
>> Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments .
> 
> in JS the read method can also be "read all",  should probably update that gist
> 
>> 
>> @summers do you have a gist for java API?
>> thoughts?
>> 
>> ++
>> Corinne
>> [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-not-to-pipe-td6135.html
>> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408
>> [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c
>> [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev