[aerogear-dev] Angular.js branch and UPS

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Wed May 21 11:20:00 EDT 2014


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Good morning peeps,
>
> While I was navigating at angular branch
> (
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keycloak),
> I notice
> that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js
>

you guys ? :) it's more a 'we' are not using it ;-)


I was following this demo template from Bill:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aerogear-ups

No usage of keycloak.js there ;)




> (
> http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/index.html#d4e546).
> My
> question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?
>


sure, talking to Stian on IRC I got the impression it's good to be used



>
> My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.
>

yep, fully agree - I can't access JIRA atm, otherwise I'd have created a
"keycloak.js usage" item under the AGPUSH-568 epic




>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140521/6c4ca0ca/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list