[aerogear-dev] Angular.js branch and UPS

[Bruno Oliveira]

On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > Good morning peeps,
> >
> > While I was navigating at angular branch
> > (
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keycloak),
> > I notice
> > that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js
> >
>
> you guys ? :) it's more a 'we' are not using it ;-)

meh, bad wording.

>
>
> I was following this demo template from Bill:
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aerogear-ups
>
> No usage of keycloak.js there ;)

In theory we do
(https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/pom.xml#L209). Maybe we
just don't use it?

>
>
>
>
> > (
> > http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/index.html#d4e546).
> > My
> > question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?
> >
>
>
> sure, talking to Stian on IRC I got the impression it's good to be used
>
>
>
> >
> > My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.
> >
>
> yep, fully agree - I can't access JIRA atm, otherwise I'd have created a
> "keycloak.js usage" item under the AGPUSH-568 epic
>
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj