[aerogear-dev] First go at stats/activity wireframes

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Yeah IT folks basically;

The (IT) owner of HR app, the (It) owner of marketing app etc

On Friday, May 23, 2014, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On May 21, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matzew at apache.org');>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bsutter at redhat.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 21, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matzew at apache.org');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> BTW. on the top box (first screen), I am querying the DB per user:
>> - "my" applications (the active is worthless)
>>
>> OK - so the "5" in the wireframe would be the "Total of My Apps"?
>>
>
> yes
>
>
>> - notifications delivered by "my" apps
>>
>> Yes, that makes sense
>>
>> - devices registered with "my" apps
>>
>>
>> And when did we add the concept of "my" apps, I thought there was only
>> "super-user" who sees all apps.
>>
>
> we had that already on the 'agenda' for the initial user-management - but
> we skipped our own impl. due to Keycloak adpotion;
>
> A recent thread:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-May/007783.html
>
>
> In here I describe a 'super-user' and a 'PushAdmin':
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-May/007784.html
>
>
> Or do you think a 'shared' super-user is good enough? IMO it would be odd
> if HR Manager and Marketing Manager would be seeing each others apps;
>
> I was thinking that the HR Manager & Marketing Manager would not be "push
> admins" - they would not know how to upload the pubkey from Apple.
> I like the idea of having a PushAdmin per app - so that they only break
> their own apps.   But it would still likely be an IT person who pays the
> $99 and sets everything up.
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to chime in on that related thread
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20Push%20Server/activity-spec.png
>
> It would be odd if I see how many apps are on the entire server etc ;-)
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On May 21, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > The "Status" column only show errors. If there are none it will say
> > something amongst the lines of "Everything is fine".
> I guess what threw me off was that the Status box links to the Activity
> page - at least based on how I read that orange arrow connecting the two.
>
>
> >
> > About the graphic: Sure, it's just the wireframe and may still change in
> > the visual design depending on what looks good.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Hylke
> >
> > On 19/05/2014 16:48, Matt Carrano wrote:
> >> Hey Hylke,
> >>
> >> This is looking good. I had a few minor comments/questions about the
> layout and labeling.  Take a look at the marked up wireframe (attached).
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Hylke Bons" <hbons at redhat.com>
> >> To: aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Cc: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 8:03:13 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] First go at stats/activity wireframes
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Here are some updates based on the feedback from the meetings:
> >>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20Push%20Server/activity-spec.png
> >> - Simplified dashboard stats
> >> - Apps notifications table
> >> - Defined entry points
> >>
> >> Let me know what you think. I hope that covers everything.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Hylke
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15/05/2014 16:19, Hylke Bons wrote:
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> Here's an initial version:
> >>>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20Push%20Server/activity-spec.png
> >>>
> >>> I tried to incorporate most wishes expressed in the other thread.
> >>>
> >>> Most notable things:
> >>> - Landing page with an overview of stats, most active apps, and error
> >>> messages
> >>> - Activity table shows both registration and notification events
> >>> - Activity table is per variant, and not all activity on the server.
> >>> Unless there's a usecase to have every event for every app/variant in a
> >>> table I don't think we actually need it. The important thing is to get
> >>> to error messages easily.
> >>>
> >>> Things to do/think about:
> >>> - links/entry
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140523/7ace0989/attachment-0001.html