[aerogear-dev] [UPS] Proposal to change the Push Message Format

[Sebastien Blanc]

Hi,

Since the API Version PR  [1] has been merged we can start the work on
AGPUSH-534 to change the format of the Push message. There has been some
discussions on this thread and this gist
https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/8897596
Just want to be sure everyone is okay or have remarks before starting
implementing this.

Questions ?

Sebi

[1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/394
[2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Monday, February 10, 2014, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> here is the current format for comparison
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/8915817
>>>
>>> +1 to being more structured.
>>>
>>> one thing though,  in the current format, simplePush is not part of the
>>> message, but it's own thing
>>>
>> Yeah, that's why I put it in the config section in my first version but
>> Matzew suggested it was more part of the message payload
>>
>
>
> Nope to config; should stay its own, does not (IMO) make sense to include
> in tve message for richer platforms like Android/iOS
>
>
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I was looking at our current Push Message Format[1] and I was wonderimg
>> if you should not add some more structure to it, decoupling config,
>> criterias and the message itself :
>>
>>
>> {
>>   "config" : {
>>
>>      "ttl" : 3600,
>>      "content-available" : true,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      "simple-push": "version=123"
>>
>>   },
>>   "criteria" : {
>>
>>       "alias" : ["user at account.com", "someone at aerogear.org", ....],
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       "categories" : ["someCategory", "otherCategory"],
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       "deviceType" : ["iPad", "AndroidTablet"],
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       "variants" : ["c3f0a94f-48de-4b77-a08e-68114460857e", "444939cd-ae63-4ce1-96a4-de74b77e3737"]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   }
>>   ,
>>   "message": {
>>     "alert":"HELLO!",
>>     "sound":"default",
>>     "badge":7,
>>
>>     "someKey":"some value",
>>
>>     "anotherCustomKey":"some other value"
>>
>>   },
>>   }
>>
>> wdyt ?
>>
>>
>> interesting idea - it looks better structured.
>>
>> Re
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141010/852cb65c/attachment.html