[aerogear-dev] [UPS] Proposal to change the Push Message Format

[Sebastien Blanc]

Here a first question :
Do we want to change also how the Java Sender construct its message ?
Now we have a "plain" builder pattern, do we want now
message.criteria.alias("fdfd") ?
I'm not sure
Sebi


On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since the API Version PR  [1] has been merged we can start the work on
> AGPUSH-534 to change the format of the Push message. There has been some
> discussions on this thread and this gist
> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/8897596
> Just want to be sure everyone is okay or have remarks before starting
> implementing this.
>
> Questions ?
>
> Sebi
>
> [1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/394
> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 10, 2014, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> here is the current format for comparison
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/8915817
>>>>
>>>> +1 to being more structured.
>>>>
>>>> one thing though,  in the current format, simplePush is not part of the
>>>> message, but it's own thing
>>>>
>>> Yeah, that's why I put it in the config section in my first version but
>>> Matzew suggested it was more part of the message payload
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope to config; should stay its own, does not (IMO) make sense to
>> include in tve message for richer platforms like Android/iOS
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I was looking at our current Push Message Format[1] and I was wonderimg
>>> if you should not add some more structure to it, decoupling config,
>>> criterias and the message itself :
>>>
>>>
>>> {
>>>   "config" : {
>>>
>>>      "ttl" : 3600,
>>>      "content-available" : true,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      "simple-push": "version=123"
>>>
>>>   },
>>>   "criteria" : {
>>>
>>>       "alias" : ["user at account.com", "someone at aerogear.org", ....],
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       "categories" : ["someCategory", "otherCategory"],
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       "deviceType" : ["iPad", "AndroidTablet"],
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       "variants" : ["c3f0a94f-48de-4b77-a08e-68114460857e", "444939cd-ae63-4ce1-96a4-de74b77e3737"]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   }
>>>   ,
>>>   "message": {
>>>     "alert":"HELLO!",
>>>     "sound":"default",
>>>     "badge":7,
>>>
>>>     "someKey":"some value",
>>>
>>>     "anotherCustomKey":"some other value"
>>>
>>>   },
>>>   }
>>>
>>> wdyt ?
>>>
>>>
>>> interesting idea - it looks better structured.
>>>
>>> Re
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141010/a00facbd/attachment.html