[aerogear-dev] AeroGear.js

[Lukáš Fryč]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I'm not sure what the reason for this was historically. I think this
> concept was initally created when we were doing Pipeline.
>
Wasn't that because you want to share configuration of stores in one
DataManager?

But fully agree, it does not make much sense from user's perspective - you
can share options object anyway.

> I am leaning toward proposing we get rid of this pattern and just make a
> DataManager object hold 1 store/adapter( sync woud follow suit )
>
+1 agree
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150225/c95a85c5/attachment.html