[aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

[Lukáš Fryč]

Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch)
during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.

@Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?

I'm all for exposing it more visibly.

st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
napsal:

> Hi,
>
> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to
> notice:
>
> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant.png
>
> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab of
> the Application).
>
> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden, since
> this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.
>
> They used to be a bit more present:
>
> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant_details.png
>
> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good
> reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150624/bb78eb40/attachment.html